Submit your IO500 results for the upcoming ISC'26 list, which will be presented at our BOF. See the Call for Submissions for details.
Ranking of production system submissions. This is a subset of the Full List of submissions that meet additional criteria for redundancy and usage, showing only one highest-scoring result per storage system.
| # | BoF | Information | IO500 | Repro. | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institution System · FS Type | Storage Vendor | Client Nodes | Total Client Proc. | Score | BW | MD | |||
| (GiB/s) | (kIOP/s) | ||||||||
| 1 | ISC23 | LRZ | Lenovo | 24 | 2,688 | 1,386.41 | 336.35 | 5,714.63 | |
| 2 | ISC23 | EuroHPC-CINECA | DDN | 2,000 | 16,000 | 648.96 | 807.12 | 521.79 | |
| 3 | ISC22 | China Telecom Research Institute | CTCLOUD | 10 | 200 | 187.84 | 25.29 | 1,395.01 | - |
| 4 | ISC23 | Imperial College London | Lenovo | 32 | 512 | 119.56 | 44.63 | 320.31 | |
| 5 | ISC23 | Arizona State University | Dell | 10 | 160 | 16.48 | 4.40 | 61.76 | |
Top 5 systems compared
Each axis is scaled to the highest value among these systems — 100% marks the leader on that dimension. Click a system below to toggle it.
- #1 SuperMUC-NG-Phase2-EC LRZ
- #2 Leonardo EuroHPC-CINECA
- #3 CTPAI China Telecom Research Institute
- #4 Imperial - hx cluster Imperial College London
- #5 Sol Arizona State University